“If something seems too good to be true, it usually is.”
For years, Bitcoin has been marketed as a monetary messiah. A borderless, bankless utopia. A digital escape from inflation, central banks, and government control. But peel back the layers of myth, and a far more complex picture emerges—one involving gambling roots, market manipulation, and a system that may have been engineered more for speculation than liberation.
This article is a synthesis of public records, academic studies, blockchain data, and expert commentary. It presents a critical interpretation of the Bitcoin ecosystem’s evolution, particularly its ties to online gambling, speculative markets, and centralised infrastructure. The aim is to foster informed debate—not to offer financial advice or legal conclusions.
A Different Origin Story
Bitcoin’s whitepaper talks about peer-to-peer payments. But what they don’t often tell you is that early versions of Bitcoin’s codebase (as far back as April 2008) reportedly included a built-in poker game, an IRC client, and a P2P marketplace.
Far from being a clean monetary solution, this original build suggests Bitcoin may have begun as an experimental tool for unregulated exchange—especially in online gambling circles seeking a workaround to the Unlawful Internet Gambling Enforcement Act of 2006.
Even the 21-million coin cap might be more symbolic than economic. Some speculate it references blackjack’s winning number, 21. That symbolism, combined with early gambling mechanics, points to a much messier, improvised beginning than the idealistic whitepaper suggests.
The IRC Client (Internet Relay Chat)
What it is:
IRC is an old-school real-time messaging protocol used in the early internet days for chat rooms, private groups, and community coordination.
Why it matters in Bitcoin’s early code:
- It was used to bootstrap peer discovery in the absence of modern decentralised node discovery tools.
- Including IRC suggests Bitcoin wasn’t just designed for anonymous transactions, but also for real-time, peer communication — which fits with underground or grey-market use cases (like gambling, filesharing, or darknet trading).
- It also points to community-building among early adopters who needed a way to coordinate outside of traditional platforms (which were monitored or censored).
Interpretation:
- Including an IRC client indicates the project wasn’t just about sending money, but about creating a decentralised, self-contained ecosystem for coordination and trade — one outside the scope of legal or regulated oversight.
The P2P Marketplace Framework
What it is:
A peer-to-peer (P2P) marketplace allows individuals to transact directly — buying, selling, or exchanging goods/services — without intermediaries like banks or platforms.
Why it matters in the code:
- Including a marketplace suggests that Bitcoin was envisioned not as a store of value, but as a functional, transactional currency from the start — one meant to be used immediately for exchange.
- A P2P marketplace aligns closely with online poker or grey-market activity, where players needed to exchange money for digital services or bets without banks getting in the way.
- It mirrors platforms like Silk Road, eBay, or Craigslist — but decentralised, anonymous, and unregulated.
Interpretation:
- This framework signals a transactional and practical vision for Bitcoin, focused on use within black or grey economies where traditional rails (banking, PayPal, fiat) were unavailable or hostile.
The Bigger Picture
When combined with:
- A built-in poker game,
- The symbolic 21 million cap,
- And the context of post-UIGEA online gambling crackdowns…
…it paints a picture of Bitcoin’s prototype as a tool for anonymous, unbanked digital trade — not as a monetary philosophy or long-term investment vehicle.
It also shows that early Bitcoin was improvisational, experimental, and very much tied to the needs of communities looking to evade financial surveillance and restrictions.
The Poker Crowd That Built Bitcoin
Bitcoin’s earliest adopters weren’t all tech utopians. Many were online gamblers, libertarians, and workaround engineers. Consider:
- Roger Ver (“Bitcoin Jesus”): Early investor in SatoshiDice, one of the first Bitcoin gambling platforms. Vocal libertarian and backer of several high-risk crypto ventures.
- Charlie Shrem: Co-founder of BitInstant, a platform enabling fast, often anonymous Bitcoin purchases. He later served prison time for facilitating unlicensed money transmission linked to Silk Road.
- Mark Karpelès: Took over Mt. Gox (originally a card-trading site) and turned it into the world’s largest Bitcoin exchange—before losing 850,000 BTC in one of crypto’s most infamous collapses.
These figures shaped the early infrastructure and norms of Bitcoin’s growth—many of which revolved around speed, anonymity, and speculation. [See below for a deeper look into the three key early figures in Bitcoin’s history].
Tether, Blockstream & the Market Engineering Debate
Tether (USDT)
Tether claims to be a stablecoin pegged to the US dollar, but has never undergone a full independent audit. In 2019, its lawyers admitted USDT was only 74% backed at the time.
Research from Griffin & Shams (2018) linked Tether issuance directly to Bitcoin price surges, suggesting that large amounts of USDT were minted and used to buy BTC on exchanges like Bitfinex (which shares ownership with Tether), inflating demand.
Blockstream & the Lightning Network
Blockstream, co-founded by Adam Back (named in the Bitcoin whitepaper), promoted the Lightning Network as a scaling solution. However, critics argue this off-chain infrastructure introduces centralisation and gatekeeping, which runs counter to Bitcoin’s original peer-to-peer philosophy.
Blockstream also played a key role in the “block size wars,” pushing to keep on-chain capacity small—which arguably benefits institutional control over high-volume activity.
El Salvador: Case Study or PR Campaign?
El Salvador became the first country to make Bitcoin legal tender, but reports suggest that most of its BTC “purchases” were internal transfers from Bitfinex/Tether wallets—not open-market buys.
The government-backed Chivo Wallet saw usage drop by over 98% within months. Analysts have raised concerns about the lack of transparency in El Salvador’s Bitcoin programme, including the involvement of crypto firms in shaping policy.
Rather than organic adoption, critics argue this was a top-down effort used to launder legitimacy and delay regulatory scrutiny.
Manufactured Narratives and Strategic Silence
Several influential voices in the Bitcoin space maintain tight-lipped positions on controversies:
- Jack Mallers (Strike): Promoted as a disruptor, but Strike reportedly operates on Tether rails and is linked to Blockstream. Some on-chain data suggests related entities may have received substantial Bitcoin from known Tether reserves.
- Michael Saylor (MicroStrategy): A dominant public advocate for Bitcoin, yet rarely acknowledges the role of Tether in BTC price movements. MicroStrategy’s leveraged purchases could be vulnerable to any significant market correction.
These silences are strategic. When much of the market’s liquidity may be synthetic, acknowledging that fact could trigger the very collapse it aims to avoid.
What Happens If the Illusion Breaks?
If Tether is ever fully investigated or regulated, the ripple effect on Bitcoin could be severe. Multiple studies and market watchers argue that Tether injections drive demand artificially, and any disruption could deflate Bitcoin’s price rapidly.
While some believe users would simply convert USDT to BTC if the peg fails, others warn that the confidence collapse would prompt a mass sell-off and crash well below current price levels.
Tether is formally registered in the British Virgin Islands (BVI), a well-known offshore jurisdiction.
Here’s a clearer breakdown:
Corporate Structure
- Tether Limited is incorporated in the British Virgin Islands.
- It is part of a group of companies under the parent company iFinex Inc., which is registered in Hong Kong.
- iFinex also owns Bitfinex, the cryptocurrency exchange closely linked with Tether in both operations and shared personnel.
Key Points
- Offshore registration in the BVI provides regulatory opacity, minimal public disclosure requirements, and tax advantages.
- This structure has raised transparency concerns, particularly regarding:
- Verification of Tether’s reserves
- Cross-company fund flows between Tether and Bitfinex
- Regulatory accountability in the event of financial misconduct
Additional Context
- In 2019, the New York Attorney General (NYAG) investigated Tether and Bitfinex for alleged misuse of reserves and misleading investors.
- The investigation concluded with a settlement, requiring Tether to stop doing business with New York residents and to provide quarterly reserve disclosures — but no formal audit was ever completed.
Looking Ahead: Not All Crypto Is Created Equal
Bitcoin may face structural vulnerabilities, but this doesn’t mean the entire blockchain space is doomed. Projects with real utility—like Ethereum, Ripple, or AI-integrated platforms—may retain value in a regulated future.
However, inflated valuations across the sector mean that a correction is not only possible—it may be necessary.
Final Thoughts
“The illusion of wealth, freedom, or decentralisation is more dangerous than the lack of it.”
Bitcoin was never just code. It was a culture—and one heavily shaped by gamblers, early adopters, and opaque institutions. We owe it to ourselves to ask harder questions:
- Who benefits from the dominant Bitcoin narrative?
- What remains when hype and liquidity dry up?
- And how can we rebuild a digital economy that serves people—not just insiders?
If you’re building alternatives to extraction, you’re not alone. Let’s keep digging.
Here’s a deeper look into the three key early figures in Bitcoin’s history:
1. Roger Ver — “Bitcoin Jesus”
Background:
- Roger Ver earned the nickname “Bitcoin Jesus” for being one of the earliest and most vocal evangelists of Bitcoin.
- A libertarian and former CEO of MemoryDealers.com, he was among the first entrepreneurs to accept Bitcoin as payment for goods and services.
- Prior to Bitcoin, Ver served time in U.S. federal prison for selling explosive materials online, further fueling his anti-government, pro-decentralisation ideology.
Ties to Gambling & Crypto Ventures:
- Ver was a heavy promoter and funder of early crypto startups, many of which were associated with gambling, grey-market finance, and libertarian-leaning fintech.
- He invested in Blockchain.info, BitPay, Kraken, and SatoshiDice, the latter being one of the first and most successful Bitcoin gambling platforms. SatoshiDice helped legitimise Bitcoin as a medium of exchange for high-risk, fast-moving transactions — particularly in online betting.
Later Career:
- Ver became a central figure in the Bitcoin Cash (BCH) fork of 2017, which split from Bitcoin (BTC) over disagreements about scaling. He advocated for BCH as the “real Bitcoin” due to its larger block size and low fees.
- His reputation has become more controversial over time, with critics accusing him of misleading branding and self-serving narratives.
2. Charlie Shrem — The Face of Early Bitcoin Infrastructure
Background:
- A 22-year-old college dropout at the time, Charlie Shrem co-founded BitInstant in 2011 with backing from investors including Roger Ver.
- BitInstant was one of the first Bitcoin exchanges, allowing users to buy Bitcoin at over 700,000 retail locations (via cash deposits at physical stores).
- The platform catered to users who wanted anonymous, fast Bitcoin purchases—a core appeal for online gamblers and Silk Road users.
Legal Issues & Connection to Gambling:
- In 2014, Shrem was arrested and convicted of aiding and abetting the operation of an unlicensed money transmitting business.
- Prosecutors linked BitInstant to money laundering tied to Silk Road, the darknet marketplace where Bitcoin was commonly used to buy drugs and contraband.
- He served two years in federal prison, becoming one of the first high-profile Bitcoin figures to face legal consequences.
- After release, he re-entered the crypto world as a commentator, consultant, and investor, often reflecting publicly on the “wild west” origins of crypto.
3. Mark Karpelès — The Mt. Gox Meltdown
Background:
- A French programmer and entrepreneur, Mark Karpelès acquired Mt. Gox in 2011 from Jed McCaleb.
- Mt. Gox originally stood for “Magic: The Gathering Online eXchange,” a trading platform for fantasy card game players.
- Under Karpelès’ control, it transformed into the world’s largest Bitcoin exchange, handling over 70% of global BTC transactions at its peak.
The Collapse:
- In 2014, Mt. Gox filed for bankruptcy, claiming 850,000 Bitcoins had been lost or stolen—then worth around $450 million.
- The event was the first major crisis in Bitcoin history, severely damaging public trust and prompting calls for greater regulation.
- Karpelès was arrested by Japanese authorities in 2015 for embezzlement and manipulation of exchange data. While acquitted on embezzlement charges, he was convicted of falsifying financial records and given a suspended prison sentence.
Legacy:
- Mt. Gox remains symbolic of the risks of centralised crypto infrastructure.
- Karpelès, once trusted by millions of users, became a poster child for mismanagement and the fragility of early crypto ventures.
Why These Three Figures Matter
Each of these men — Ver, Shrem, and Karpelès — played a crucial role in shaping the early Bitcoin ecosystem, but all three were:
- Deeply connected to the unregulated, high-risk subcultures of gambling and darknet finance.
- Instrumental in building Bitcoin’s reputation as a speculative tool, rather than a functional currency.
- Later entangled in legal battles, reputation crises, or ideological splits that reflect the instability of Bitcoin’s foundation.
Together, they reveal that Bitcoin’s meteoric rise was never purely about decentralised ideals — it was as much about fast money, grey zones, and opportunism as it was about innovation.
4. Jack Mallers – The Payment Disruptor Behind Strike
Who he is:
Jack Mallers is the founder and CEO of Strike, a payments platform that uses the Bitcoin Lightning Network to enable fast, low-cost, cross-border payments. He rose to prominence as one of the youngest and most passionate public advocates for Bitcoin as a global monetary network.
Contributions:
- Played a key role in El Salvador’s adoption of Bitcoin, working closely with policymakers to implement Bitcoin as legal tender.
- Positioned Strike as a modern, Bitcoin-native alternative to traditional remittance services.
- Regularly speaks at major crypto and fintech events, often highlighting Bitcoin’s potential for financial inclusion and freedom.
Controversies:
- Strike’s infrastructure reportedly relies heavily on stablecoin infrastructure (like Tether) and custodial integrations, raising questions about decentralisation.
- Mallers is associated with Blockstream, a company that has significant influence over Bitcoin development through the Lightning Network. Critics argue this creates centralisation pressure within a system marketed as decentralised.
- On-chain analysis and independent researchers have raised unverified concerns about internal liquidity sourcing — but these remain unproven and should be treated as investigative leads, not conclusions.
Balanced View:
Mallers represents the next generation of Bitcoin advocacy: energetic, mission-driven, and focused on usability. Whether Strike fulfils Bitcoin’s decentralised promise — or leans into a new form of centralised fintech — remains part of an evolving industry debate.
5. Michael Saylor – Bitcoin’s Corporate Champion
Who he is:
Michael Saylor is the Executive Chairman and co-founder of MicroStrategy, a business intelligence firm. He is best known for leading one of the most aggressive corporate Bitcoin accumulation strategies in history.
Contributions:
- Transformed MicroStrategy into a Bitcoin treasury vehicle, acquiring over 200,000 BTC since 2020.
- Frequently frames Bitcoin as “digital energy” or “a monetary battery” in public discourse.
- Spearheaded institutional interest in Bitcoin through high-profile conferences and public interviews.
Controversies:
- MicroStrategy has taken on significant debt to fund Bitcoin purchases, making the company highly exposed to BTC price volatility.
- Saylor’s earlier history includes an SEC investigation in 2000, where MicroStrategy was forced to restate financials, leading to a dramatic stock collapse — a fact now often cited by critics.
- He rarely discusses systemic risks, such as the influence of stablecoins like Tether on Bitcoin’s market structure, which some view as strategic silence given MicroStrategy’s exposure.
Balanced View:
Saylor has brought unprecedented corporate visibility and legitimacy to Bitcoin, inspiring CFOs and boardrooms to consider crypto as a treasury asset. However, his approach also raises questions about financial engineering, concentration risk, and long-term sustainability.
Why These Two Matter
Both Mallers and Saylor are influential voices shaping Bitcoin’s narrative:
- Mallers pushes the vision of everyday payments and global access.
- Saylor positions Bitcoin as a store of value and inflation hedge for large institutions.
Their platforms and philosophies offer very different visions for Bitcoin’s future. Understanding their backgrounds and incentives helps stakeholders make more informed assessments — not just of the technology, but of the ecosystem steering it.
[Sources available upon request. This article is for educational and critical analysis purposes only.]
Join the M-POWER Movement: From Financial Extraction to Personal Liberation
We’re not here to sell you products. We’re here to help you reclaim your power.
The old financial system thrived on confusion, dependency, and hidden fees.
The new era is about clarity, confidence, and conscious choice.
What You’ll Gain
Empowered Planning
Learn how to manage your money without salespeople or smoke and mirrors.
Flat fees. No jargon. Total control.
Purposeful Enterprise
Turn your experience into a mission-led practice.
Whether you guide others or just guide yourself — we’ll show you how.
Conscious Evolution
Grow beyond old paradigms. Step into Aquarian leadership, where financial planning meets soul purpose.
How to Begin
Join the M-POWER Community
→ Free access to resources, events, and peers redefining the future of planning.
→ Community Link
Book a Discovery Call
→ Personal guidance to align your money with meaning — no sales, just insight
→ Booking Page
Be the Ripple
→ Share this post or invite others to the movement.
→ Join Planning My Life Facebook Group
The future isn’t built on percentage fees.
It’s built on purpose, participation, and personal agency.
Let’s shift the system — one planner at a time.
#MPOWER #FinancialFreedom #AquarianPlanning #SelfAgency #FlatFees #DimensionalLeadership #GAMEPlan #FinancialTransparency
Academy of Life Planning 