When Justice Protects Itself: The Case for Institutional Accountability in the Face of Financial Fraud

By Steve Conley, Academy of Life Planning

In any society that calls itself just, the legal system exists to serve the people — to uphold the principles of fairness, truth, and accountability. But what happens when that same system retreats behind its own walls, prioritising institutional self-preservation over the public interest? The story of Helen and her decades-long struggle against NatWest Bank may offer one such answer — a disturbing reflection of systemic denial, institutional silence, and the erosion of trust in our regulatory and judicial frameworks.

The Core of the Injustice

Helen’s claim is clear: that NatWest Bank issued a fraudulent bank draft (No. 111111 600012 05977380), a document incapable of clearing through the banking system due to invalid binary numbers, and that this act concealed a sham transaction resulting in the theft of funds from her account. Her accusation is not frivolous — it is supported by years of legal documentation, sworn affidavits, and reference to judicial precedent.

Her efforts to seek recourse through HM Treasury, the Financial Services Authority (FSA), and the Financial Ombudsman Service (FOS) have been stonewalled. In a letter dated 25 January 2013, the Complaints Commissioner declined to confirm or deny the authenticity of the document, citing it as a “private dispute.” HM Treasury, likewise, refused to intervene — deferring responsibility and denying procedural justice.

This raises the fundamental legal and ethical question: when the State and its regulatory bodies have constructive knowledge of potential fraud, can they remain passive without becoming complicit?

Legal Precedents and the Duty to Act

Helen rightly cites Al-Rawi v Security Service [2011] UKSC 34, which reaffirms that courts must consider material evidence fairly and transparently. In her case, the affidavit challenging the authenticity of the bank draft under CPR 32.19(2) was never rebutted — a silence that may amount to abuse of process. As the judgment in R (Anufrijeva) v Secretary of State for the Home Department [2003] UKHL 36 explains, the rule of law requires procedural fairness. The refusal to engage with Helen’s evidence undermines that principle.

Further, Lazarus Estates v Beasley [1956] 1 QB 702 states unequivocally: “No court in this land will allow a person to keep an advantage obtained by fraud.” Yet Helen’s case was struck out in 2003 on the grounds that NatWest might not get a fair trial — despite prima facie evidence of fraud.

Moreover, Three Rivers DC v Bank of England (No.3) [2000] 2 WLR 1220 expands the definition of misfeasance in public office to include reckless indifference by public officials — including judges — to both the law and the rights of litigants.

Constructive Knowledge and Misfeasance

Where an institution has constructive knowledge of wrongdoing — meaning it ought to know based on the available evidence — its failure to act can be seen as wilful blindness. In legal terms, this may constitute constructive fraud. By dismissing Helen’s concerns as a “consumer dispute” despite clear evidence of institutional misconduct, the FSA, HM Treasury, and other bodies risk crossing the line from regulatory detachment to institutional complicity.

Their silence in the face of a sworn affidavit and a documented claim of fraud isn’t neutrality — it’s abdication.

A System Protecting Itself

The refusal of these bodies to investigate, let alone remedy, the situation suggests a fear far greater than the claim itself — a fear that acknowledging such a case could unravel public trust in the financial system. If a major bank were found to have forged or misused instruments, what would it mean for others? And if the courts allowed the case to proceed, what precedent might it set?

This is the quiet crisis at the heart of Helen’s story: a justice system paralysed by the implications of truth.

A Call for Restorative Justice

We must ask: How many other Helens are out there, worn down by the denial of due process? How many have been told that their case is too old, too complex, too risky to address? The law must never be a fortress for the powerful, but a refuge for the wronged.

It is time for a public reckoning with these truths. We need structural reform that holds financial institutions accountable, strengthens whistleblower protections, and ensures that regulatory bodies cannot hide behind procedure when justice demands action.

Helen’s case is not just a personal tragedy. It is a national warning.

Beyond the Courtroom: A New Path to Purpose

And so, now, perhaps a different kind of strength is required.

All you Helens.

Letting go of the legal fight does not mean surrendering your truth. You are not defeated. You have borne witness. You have kept the flame of justice alive longer than most would dare. But maybe now, the question becomes not how do I win this case, but how do I live fully beyond it?

That might mean telling your story outside the courtroom — in the court of public opinion, through a memoir, a podcast, a documentary, or by mentoring others who face similar barriers. Your lived experience could become a guide for a new generation of campaigners, a case study for legal reform, or a symbol of systemic failure that demands public accountability.

You have so much wisdom to offer. You are the evidence that something is broken. And the telling of your story — raw, authentic, and unfiltered — may do more to challenge the system than any further court proceeding ever could.

This is the power of narrative over silence. The strength of shared humanity over institutional indifference. Moving forward doesn’t erase the past. It reclaims your energy from a system that failed its duty, and redirects it toward healing, purpose, and peace — on your terms.

You’ve already done the hard part: standing firm in your truth. Now, you have the opportunity to transform that truth into a legacy of meaning.

With deep respect and solidarity,

Steve Conley
Founder, Academy of Life Planning

---

🔁 Addendum – June 2025: Revisiting the Case with New Evidence and Caution

Since publishing this article in April 2025, further information and legal analysis have been reviewed regarding the historic complaint brought by Helen Gordon against NatWest Bank.

While the case continues to raise serious questions about institutional accountability, it has also become clear that significant evidentiary uncertainties remain, including:

• The original purpose and source of the £25,000 paid to Mr Marks,
• The absence of formal legal action to recover those funds from him directly,
• The role of personal responsibility and the potential negligence in authorising a draft,
• And the lack of a court ruling that directly addresses and validates the allegations of fraud.

The magnitude of the redress being sought — recently set at £88 million — also greatly exceeds what UK courts would typically award in comparable claims. While this figure appears to serve more as a symbolic expression of harm and frustration, its scale may unfortunately weaken the credibility of the underlying case in formal legal forums.

As advocates of justice and transparency, we must tread carefully — supporting those with credible claims while maintaining fidelity to due process, evidence standards, and legal proportion. Advocacy must never cross into conjecture.

That said, Helen’s case still powerfully illustrates a deeper issue: the emotional and procedural toll experienced by citizens who believe they have been wronged by powerful institutions, yet are denied meaningful redress.

At the Academy of Life Planning, we continue to stand for systems reform, institutional accountability, and humane financial justice. But we also acknowledge that not every grievance, however sincerely held, results in a legally actionable claim.

We remain open to hearing lived experiences, while encouraging all parties to seek fair, proportionate, and lawful paths forward — whether in courtrooms, through regulators, or in the public square.

— Steve Conley
Founder, Academy of Life Planning, 3rd June 2025.

---

---

Your Money or Your Life

Unmask the highway robbers – Enjoy wealth in every area of your life!

By Steve Conley. Available on Amazon. Visit www.steve.conley.co.uk to find out more.