Hartley Pensions Court Case: 17,000 Pensioners Caught in Cross-Border Scandal Seek Justice

This week, a pivotal High Court hearing commenced in London, shining a harsh spotlight on Hartley Pensions Ltd, a failed Self-Invested Personal Pension (SIPP) provider whose collapse has left around 17,000 pensioners uncertain about the safety of their retirement savings.

The four-day hearing is more than a legal proceeding—it represents a critical test of the UK’s regulatory framework, insolvency laws, and the very principles of consumer protection in the financial services industry.

A Timeline of Trouble

Hartley Pensions entered administration in July 2022 after a period of aggressive expansion. In the years leading up to its downfall, the firm had acquired a string of troubled SIPP books from other collapsed providers, including Berkeley Burke, Lifetime SIPP, and Greyfriars. Many of these books contained high-risk, illiquid, and often unregulated investments, such as Dolphin Trust, Ethical Forestry, and Harlequin Property.

This accumulation of toxic assets proved fatal. The Financial Conduct Authority (FCA) imposed restrictions on the firm’s activities in early 2022 amid growing concerns about its financial stability and compliance. Shortly afterward, Hartley Pensions was placed into administration, leaving thousands of pension savers in limbo.

The Legal Questions at Stake

At the heart of this week’s High Court hearing is a crucial point of law: what legal authority do the joint administrators hold to manage and transfer client assets, particularly when those assets are tied up in investments of questionable legality or enforceability?

Specifically, the court is being asked to rule on:

  • Whether the administrators can legally transfer clients’ SIPPs, especially those containing impaired or toxic investments, to alternative providers without explicit client consent.
  • Whether contracts inherited from failed SIPP providers—some of which may have breached UK financial regulations—are valid and enforceable.
  • The extent of the administrators’ fiduciary duties to clients versus their obligations under insolvency law.
  • Whether the FCA’s regulatory interventions were adequate, or whether systemic failures contributed to the scale of the collapse.

The Human Cost

Behind the legal arguments lies a profound human story. Thousands of ordinary savers now face the prospect of reduced or lost retirement incomes. Many invested in these SIPPs on the advice of intermediaries who steered them toward exotic, high-risk schemes promising outsized returns. For some, life savings are locked away in investments that may never recover their value.

While the Financial Services Compensation Scheme (FSCS) has stepped in to fund the administrators’ exit strategy, it does not cover investment losses—only the costs of transferring pension arrangements to new providers.

This leaves many clients wondering: who is accountable for protecting their future?

A Cautionary Tale for Financial Planning

For financial planners, the Hartley Pensions case offers sobering lessons about governance, transparency, and the ethical stewardship of client funds. It underscores the risks inherent in structures where profit motives eclipse client outcomes and where regulatory oversight struggles to keep pace with innovation and complexity in financial products.

It also raises broader systemic questions: how can we create financial systems that empower individuals rather than exposing them to exploitation? How do we balance consumer freedom with protection? And how can we ensure that scandals like this are not repeated?

Towards a More Transparent Future

The outcome of this High Court hearing could set powerful legal precedents, influencing the responsibilities of insolvency practitioners, the rights of pension scheme members, and the future oversight of SIPP providers.

But beyond the courtroom, it calls for a deeper cultural shift in financial planning—a shift toward holistic, transparent, client-centric approaches that prioritise “enough” over excess, empowerment over dependency, and long-term well-being over short-term gains.

At the Academy of Life Planning, we stand for this vision. We advocate for financial systems rooted in integrity, transparency, and human flourishing. The Hartley Pensions scandal is a painful reminder of why that mission matters more than ever.


🙌 Stand With Ian. Speak the Truth. Spark the Change.

Ian Davis fought not just for himself, but for all of us.
If you’ve been affected by financial crime, or if you believe no one should ever suffer in silence—share this story. Raise awareness. Demand reform. Reclaim your power.

  • 🔗 Share this post with someone who needs to read it.
  • 📣 Join the movement to unmask the robbers and rebuild lives.
  • ✍️ Leave a comment to honour Ian or share your story.
  • 🤝 Volunteer or collaborate with the Academy of Life Planning or Transparency Task Force.

🕯️ Let’s make sure no voice like Ian’s is ever silenced again.


Your Money or Your Life

Unmask the highway robbers – Enjoy wealth in every area of your life!

By Steve Conley. Available on Amazon. Visit www.steve.conley.co.uk to find out more.

One thought on “Hartley Pensions Court Case: 17,000 Pensioners Caught in Cross-Border Scandal Seek Justice

  1. Hartley Pensions Clients Protest Outside Court Over £1bn Missing Funds

    Clients of collapsed firm Hartley Pensions protested outside the High Court on May 7 as they continued their fight to recover lost pensions. The company went into liquidation in July 2022 after the Financial Conduct Authority (FCA) uncovered serious financial and regulatory failings, including £21 million of unauthorised investments.

    Over 17,000 pensioners are affected, with claims that up to £1 billion in investments is missing. Protestors from the Hartley Pensions Action Group (HPAG) displayed banners demanding answers and accountability.

    Court proceedings revealed further complexities: several linked companies have also collapsed, including Hartley’s parent company, making fund recovery harder. Administrator Nicholas Barnett, appointed in August 2022, has applied to resign, citing challenges in his role.

    Barnett described working with various stakeholders—including insolvency firm Quantuma and consultancy Hilco—while navigating tangled financial structures and disputes over how remaining funds should be distributed.

    A central concern is the lack of transparency over where client money has gone, with critics pointing to opaque investment practices and poor oversight. HPAG’s founder, Simon Nuttall, is calling for a Crown-level investigation into the missing funds.

    The hearing continues today (May 8) as pensioners demand answers and justice for what they see as a devastating loss of their retirement savings.

Leave a comment