From the Post Office Horizon scandal to the fresh allegations in BBC Panorama’s Did Lloyds Bank Fail My Business?, 2025 has thrown the same problem into sharp relief: when organisations control the evidence and can afford heavy-hitting lawyers, consumer protection is the first casualty. Latest news & breaking headlinesThe Guardian
Yet the very technologies once used to obscure the truth are becoming tools for exposure. Artificial-intelligence disclosure platforms, collaborative whistle-blower networks and open-data journalism are arming victims with answers—and leverage—faster than regulators can rewrite their rule-books.
1 | Scandals that refuse to stay buried
| Case | What went wrong | 2025 development |
|---|---|---|
| Post Office Horizon | Faulty IT mis-reported cash balances; hundreds of sub-postmasters were prosecuted. | Leaked files revealed >£1 m of unexplained “profit” transfers, reigniting calls for immediate compensation. Sky News |
| Lloyds / HBOS SME saga | Entrepreneurs claim loans were weaponised to seize viable businesses. | Fresh whistle-blower documents featured in the April Panorama episode, pressing Lloyds to reopen historic complaints. The Guardian |
The common thread is data opacity: critical transaction records were missing, altered or legally shielded until the media intervened.
2 | The counter-attack: tech-enabled transparency
- Form N264—the courts’ electronic-documents questionnaire—now forces parties to describe how data is stored and why anything has been deleted. Claimants who master it can seek adverse inferences against firms that “upgrade” systems and wipe the past.
- AI review engines slash the cost of trawling millions of messages; public-interest groups such as the Transparency Task Force are training lay users so they can self-audit disclosure dumps.
- Open-data journalism bridges the gap when regulators stall. Recent crowdsourced timelines for both Horizon and Lloyds uploaded thousands of PDFs that had never reached official inquiries.
Together, these shifts are turning information asymmetry into a shrinking asset for powerful defendants.
3 | Regulators under strain (and in transition)
| Body | Flash-point |
|---|---|
| Solicitors Regulation Authority (SRA) | A 270 % hike in its Compensation Fund levy after the Axiom Ince fiasco exposes how malpractice costs are socialised across honest firms. Law Gazette |
| RICS AI Standard | The consultation on responsible AI in surveying closed today, laying down a benchmark for evidence preservation on future tech platforms. Lexology |
| Payment Systems Regulator (PSR) | Government will abolish the PSR, folding its duties into the FCA—raising fears of a regulatory vacuum just as Visa/Mastercard litigation intensifies. Global Regulation TomorrowHome |
Fragmentation, critics argue, lets liabilities vanish between silos. A single breach can ricochet from the FCA to the SRA to HMRC without any agency owning the full picture.
4 | The looming Duty of Candour
Last year the House of Lords voted to extend a statutory duty of candour to all public authorities—a direct response to Hillsborough, Grenfell and Horizon. The Public Authority (Accountability) Bill would give victims a legal right to full and frank disclosure, with penalties for cover-ups. Hansard – UK Parliament
The Prime Minister, Sir Keir Starmer, has pledged to pass the Bill, while campaigners want the same principle copied into professional-services regulation.
5 | The six-month watch-list
- RICS publishes its final AI practice statement (Q3 2025). Will it hard-wire audit trails for all algorithmic valuations?
- Treasury’s scheme for transferring PSR powers to the FCA (expected summer 2025). Key test: will merchant-fee disputes still have a specialist forum?
- Second-reading of the Public Authority (Accountability) Bill (autumn 2025).
- Legal Services Board report on the SRA’s Axiom Ince handling. Could trigger enforcement and further levy rises.
- Mastercard/Visa collective-actions retrial on funding terms. Outcome will steer how future class-actions are financed.
6 | What practitioners and claimants can do now
| Stakeholder | Immediate actions |
|---|---|
| Consumers / SMEs | Use Form N264 language in every SAR or pre-action letter; ask precisely how historic data is backed-up and logged. |
| Ethical advisers | Build AI-based disclosure checklists; train clients to tag “missing-file” gaps before counsel is instructed. |
| Regulated firms | Audit retention and deletion policies now—once the duty of candour goes statutory, “IT-refresh amnesia” could become a contempt risk. |
| Policy advocates | Submit evidence to Commons Treasury & Justice Committees urging a single financial-services whistle-blower portal instead of today’s multi-agency maze. |
Conclusion
The UK is at a fork in the road. If the universal duty of candour passes and oversight bodies are consolidated rather than multiplied, the cost-benefit equation of secrecy flips: the price of deleting records or gagging witnesses will outweigh the gains.
For campaigners who have spent years fighting in the dark, that prospect is more than legislative housekeeping—it is the first real chance to replace the UK’s wall of silence with a culture of automatic transparency.
Steve Conley, Academy of Life Planning – 30 April 2025
Your Money or Your Life
Unmask the highway robbers – Enjoy wealth in every area of your life!
By Steve Conley. Available on Amazon. Visit www.steve.conley.co.uk to find out more.
Academy of Life Planning 