The Sunday Times recently published an article by Lily Russell-Jones on the “dangers of trusting a financial coach,” which has sparked debate and controversy within the financial industry. The piece characterises the sector as the “financial Wild West,” painting a grim picture of misadventure for those seeking financial guidance. However, this portrayal warrants scrutiny and a dive into the reality of financial coaching and its place in the market.
The portrayal of financial coaches as unregulated mavericks navigating a landscape devoid of oversight is a significant misrepresentation. Contrary to the claims in the article, financial coaches operate within the legal framework set by the Competition and Markets Authority under consumer protection law. The suggestion that financial services are somehow outside the purview of consumer protections is simply incorrect.
Furthermore, the Financial Conduct Authority (FCA) has its place, regulating product sellers who directly handle clients’ money and product placements. However, the regulation under the FCA is not a panacea. The British public continues to suffer at the hands of scammers, with an alarming £200 billion lost annually despite regulatory oversight. This stark statistic suggests that the current system, with its regulatory focus on product selling rather than pure advice, is not sufficiently safeguarding consumers.
The article’s rhetoric, using terms like “so-called” financial coaches, attempts to discredit a profession that, in reality, is composed of many highly qualified individuals, often surpassing the qualifications of some FCA-regulated advisers. This language is not just misleading but also dismissive of the genuine value that financial coaches provide.
In a commoditised investment market, the role of the middleman – the financial product seller masquerading as a planner – is increasingly questioned. The assertion that advice dispensed by financial coaches is inferior to that offered by regulated advisers ignores the crux of the issue: advice from many regulated advisers often culminates in product recommendations from which they profit, leading to potential conflicts of interest.
The article’s comparison of financial coaches to TikTok influencers peddling “get rich quick” schemes is both insulting and inaccurate. It undermines the professional and often highly educated individuals in the coaching industry who provide valuable, holistic financial planning, without the bias of product sales.
In defence of the industry, financial coaching serves as an educational foundation, empowering clients to make informed decisions. It’s about building financial literacy and capability, not merely directing clients towards specific financial products. The narrative that coaches provide poor information is unsubstantiated and fails to recognise the spectrum of expertise within the industry.
The emphasis on the distinction between ‘guidance’ and ‘advice’ is another point of contention. In a market where low-cost, diversified investment options are readily available to consumers, the value proposition of intermediaries securing ‘the best rates’ comes under scrutiny. Studies have shown that intermediaries do not consistently outperform the market, especially after accounting for charges.
Finally, the article’s claim that financial coaching lacks regulation is an outright falsehood. Financial coaching may not fall under the FCA’s domain, but it is a regulated activity with consumer protection at its heart. It is a profession committed to transparency and integrity, contrary to the Wild West depiction.
In conclusion, the narrative that has been woven around financial coaching requires a re-evaluation. While there is a need for vigilance in any industry, it is equally important to recognise the value and legitimacy of financial coaching. It offers a different – and necessary – perspective in a financial landscape that can be too quick to dismiss anything outside the realm of regulation as unworthy. The truth is, financial coaching fills a vital gap, providing accessible and impartial financial education and guidance to those who may not meet the high thresholds set by regulated financial advisers, thereby serving a broader demographic in their quest for financial wellbeing.
Academy of Life Planning 