Introduction
St James’s Place (SJP), a prominent wealth management firm, has recently been under the spotlight due to its fee structure overhaul. This move comes as a response to regulatory pressures to comply with consumer duty rules. The announcement has had a significant impact on the company’s share price, which has dropped by almost 10% in the immediate aftermath and a staggering 57% over the last two years, reaching a low of 722p.
Regulatory Compliance: Consumer Duty Rules
The Financial Conduct Authority’s (FCA) consumer duty rules mandate financial services companies to deliver “good outcomes” for customers. SJP has announced that it will build on the work completed for consumer duty, including a comprehensive assessment of its fees and charging model. Specifically, the firm plans to cap annual management charges on bond and pension investments for clients who have been invested for more than 10 years.
Market Reaction
The market has reacted strongly to these announcements, with SJP’s share price plunging. This drop is not just a reflection of the regulatory changes but also follows recent allegations against the company. Advisers within the firm have described being in a “gilded cage” due to restrictions on exiting the company and high-interest rates on loans for buying client books.
Financial Implications
The average SJP adviser reportedly owes the firm £110,000 due to loans taken out for business acquisitions. These loans are part of the firm’s “succession planning” strategy, which has been described as “proven” by a representative from SJP. However, this model is now under scrutiny, especially considering that it excludes loans worth a further £273.2 million made by a network of five major banks.
Future Outlook
SJP has stated that it is “confident” that the options under consideration will ensure value for clients and a strong, secure, and sustainable business. The firm continues to engage with its primary regulators and promises to update the market as soon as any decisions are made.
Conclusion
The regulatory landscape is shifting, and companies like St James’s Place are having to adapt quickly. While the firm is taking steps to comply with consumer duty rules, the market’s reaction indicates that there are broader concerns about its business model. It remains to be seen how these changes will affect the company’s long-term sustainability and whether they will be enough to regain investor confidence.
Sources: Financial Times, Citywire
Academy of Life Planning 